Monday, March 30, 2020

BIKE ACCIDENTS WHAT TO DO IF HIT BY A CAR WHILE RIDING A BICYCLE AT THE...

WHAT TO DO IF HIT BY A CAR WHILE RIDING A BICYCLE- AT THE ACCIDENT SCENE

  
Compiled by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. from various sources
More details at http://www.njlaws.com/bike_accidents.html?id=7229

1. Stop . . . do not leave the scene of the accident.
CALL THE POLICE, tell them where the accident occurred and ask for       medical help if needed.

2. Get names, addresses, and license numbers of all drivers involved.

Get description and registration number and insurance information of all cars involved.
License Plate Number __
Registration # __
Make  __   Year __
Damage __  
Insurance Company __
Insurance Policy Number __

3. Photos of damage to your bike and property

 Photos of accident site


4. Get names and addresses of all witnesses  
       Witnesses will be a tremendous help to you in any subsequent court action, if there is any question of liability involved. Get the names and addresses of as many witnesses as possible. If they refuse to identify themselves, jot down the license plate numbers of their automobiles. Do not discuss the accident with the witnesses. Do not give the witnesses names to anyone but the police, your attorney or your insurance company.

5. While waiting for police, write down- Accident Information
Date   __    Time __
Location   __      
No. of vehicles involved __
Weather __
Road conditions __
Damage __
Speed of the other car __

6. Summary of accident __

7. Diagram of accident

8. Call an ambulance.  If you have any reason to suspect you were injured in the accident, go to a hospital immediately or see a physician promptly.  You'll want it on record that you sought treatment right away -not in a week or so.

9. Name of Ambulance & Police Officers, Department and Badge Number

10. Do not assign or accept blame for the accident.
- The scene of the accident is not the place to determine fault. Discuss the accident only with the police, your attorney and with  representatives of your insurance company. Give the other party only your driver’s license number, registration  number and insurance information. 
-  Be cooperative with the police.

11. Seek hospital/ medical  attention.

12. Call your insurance company to report the accident. 

13. Call a personal injury attorney, not a real estate attorney:    
Call Kenneth A. Vercammen-  Trial Attorney
Attorney At Law      
(732) 572-0500
When you need help the most, we will be ready to help you. 

14. Never give a signed statement to the claims adjuster representing the other driver's insurance company.  The same goes for a phone recording.  They may be used against you in court to deny your claim. Speak with your personal injury attorney first.
These insurance people are sometimes slippery. They call you and be pleasant, then ask “ How are you”. Most persons just say “good” or “ok”. Then the recording is used against them at trial where insurance company states they were good after their accident in 2020.


IF YOU HAVE BEEN HIT BY A CAR WHILE RIDING YOUR BICYCLE;  WHILE YOUR PERSONAL INJURY CASE IS PENDING:

It is important that you --
1. DO NOT discuss your case with anyone except your doctors and attorney.
2. DO NOT make any statements or give out any information.
3. DO NOT sign any statements, reports, forms or papers of any kinds.
4. DO NOT appear at police or other hearings without first consulting with your attorney.
INFORM YOUR ATTORNEY PROMPTLY of any notice, request or summons to appear at any such hearings.
5. Refer to your attorney, anyone who asks you to sign anything or to make any statement or report or who seeks information concerning your case.
6. Direct your doctor and other treatment providers  not to furnish or disclose any information concerning your case to any entity other than your insurance company without YOU AND YOUR ATTORNEY'S WRITTEN PERMISSION.
7. You may have insurance coverages such as liability, collision, accident, Blue Cross, Blue Shield or Major Medical, which require prompt attention. However, be sure to have your treatment providers send bills immediately to all of your insurance companies.
8. Notify your attorney promptly of any new developments.  Small things may be important.  Keep your attorney informed.
9. Maintain accurate records of all information and data pertaining to your case.
10. If you or any witnesses should move, be sure to notify your attorney of the new address.

Financial Recovery for bicyclists hit by cars and injured 

1. Kenneth Vercammen Helps Injured persons
       A person who is injured as a result of the negligence of another person is what we in the legal profession refer to as a personal injury claimant.  In other words, they have been injured as a result of an accident, and you now wish to prosecute a claim against an opposing party.  As the attorney of record, I will be bringing this action for the injured person.  Therefore, I request that all clients do as much as possible to cooperate and help in every way.  The purpose of this article is to describe the procedure that we  may follow and give you sufficient instructions to enable you to assist us in this undertaking.  Needless to say, helping us is just another way of helping yourself. If you have been injured, but not in a car accident, most of this brochure is still applicable to an accident case, whether it is a fall down, dog bite or other injury.

2. Clients should provide my office with the following
1. Any bills
2. All Hospital or doctor records in your possession
3. Car Insurance Declaration Sheet  [This determines who pays your medical bills, even if you were on a bicycle!]
4. Car Insurance Policy
5. Photos of damage to your bike and property
6. Photos of accident site
7. Major Med Card
8. Paystub if lost time from work


3. Attorney- Client Confidential Relationship
       First, I want to thank our clients for giving me the opportunity to assist them in their case. I am a legal professional and I have great pride and confidence in the legal services that I perform for clients during our relationship as attorney-client. If you have concerns about your case, please call my office at (732) 572-0500.   
       We feel that this case is extremely important-not only to you, but to this office as well. This is not simply a matter of obtaining just compensation for you, although that is very important.  We take professional pride in guiding our clients carefully through difficult times to a satisfactory conclusion of their cases.   

4. Submission of Bills to Car Insurance and Major Medical
       You should submit your medical bills to your own car insurance company first. Your car insurance is required by New Jersey law to provide PIP (Personal Injury Protection) benefits under the No Fault Law. This means your car insurance company, not the careless driver, pay the majority of medical bills. This is true even if your were riding you bicycle or being hit by a car as a pedestrian!

       A person riding a bicycle is considered a pedestrian for purposes of our State automobile insurance laws. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2(h); Nuang v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 224 N.J. Super. 753, 756 (App. Div. 1988). Thus, plaintiff was eligible for payment for medical bills through their own car insurance/PIP coverage in two ways. He was eligible through his mother's automobile insurance PIP coverage because he was a members of her family residing in her household who sustained bodily injury as a result of an accident, while a pedestrian, caused by an automobile. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.  He was also eligible for PIP coverage under defendant's automobile insurance PIP coverage because he was a pedestrian, who sustained bodily injury caused by the defendant's automobile. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.  As the primary policy, plaintiff's mother's PIP coverage provided plaintiff's medical expenses.  N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2.
       

       Please provide insurance information to each doctor, MRI facility and treatment provider.  Please request they submit bills and attending physician reports to your car insurance company.  There is now minimum deductibles under the PIP Law.  There is an initial $250.00 deductible, and thereafter your car insurance company pays 80% of medical bills under a medical fee schedule established by the State Dept. of Insurance.  Your primary treating doctor must also follow "Care Path". Submit portions of bills  the car insurance does not pay to your major medical carrier (ex- Blue Cross, Connecticut General). The Law Office of Kenneth Vercammen can provide a more detailed brochure explaining how car insurance works.

5. Diary
       We want you to keep a diary of your experiences since your accident.  In addition to this daily record, we also ask you to start describing a single day in the course of your life.  In other words, describe what you do when you get up in the morning, the first thing you do after you go to work, what type of work and effort  you put into your employment, what activities you engage in after work, etc.  In other words, we need you to describe the changes in your working life, your playing life, your life as a husband or wife or child or parent.  In your written description of your day, we would appreciate your explanation in the greatest detail possible and in your own words how the accident and subsequent injuries have affected your life, your personality, and your outlook.  And remember that suffering does not entail mere physical pain; suffering can be emotional and can be transmitted to your family, friends, and co-workers.  When you have completed this description, please return it to this office in the enclosed envelope.  
       Keep a diary of all matters concerning this accident-no matter how trivial you think it may be. You should include notes on the treatments you receive, therapy, casts, appliances, hospitalization, change of doctors, change of medication, symptoms, recurrence, setbacks, disabilities and inconveniences. If you have any doubt about the propriety of including some particular information, please call the office and let us assist you.

6. Record expenses
       You can also begin to set up a system for recording the expenses incurred in conjunction with your claim in minute detail.  Medical and legal expenses are a strong part of the value of your lawsuit, so good records of these expenses must be kept at all times.  
       From time to time, however, there will be expenses incurred that you must keep track of yourself.  We ask you to make every effort to avoid any possible error or inaccuracy as jurors have a relentless reverence for the truth.  Keep your canceled checks and your list of expenses together, for we will need them at a later date.
        Your attorney will keep track of your legal expenses, which may include costs of filing, service of process, investigation, reports, depositions, witness fees, jury fees, etc.






7. Investigation and Filing of Complaint
       Procedurally, the following events occur in most personal injury cases. First, your attorney must complete our investigation and file. This will involve the collection of information from your physician, your employer, and our investigator.  We will need your Doctors to provide us with copies of all bills, medical records and possibly a medical report.
       When we feel that we have sufficient information to form an opinion as to the financial extent of your damages, we will commence negotiations with the opposition for a settlement. If the insurance company will not make an adequate offer, then a Complaint and Case Information Statement is prepared by your attorney.  It is filed in the Superior Court, Law Division.  Your attorney then will prepare a summons and have the defendants personally served with the Summons and Complaint. The defendant, through their insurance company, must file an "Answer" within 35 days.

8. Interrogatory Questions and Discovery
       The Answer is followed by a request for written interrogatories. These are questions that must be answered by each party. The Superior Court has set up certain "Form" Interrogatories, which are contained in the Rules of Court. Generally, written interrogatories are followed by the taking of depositions, which is recorded testimony given under oath by any person the opposition wishes to question. The deposition is just as important as the trial itself. In the event you are deposed during the course of this action, you will receive detailed instructions as to the procedure and will be requested to watch a videotape. After taking depositions, the case will be set down for an Arbitration. If the parties do not settle after the Arbitration, the case will be given a trial call date.
       Altogether, these procedures may take from six months to several years, and your patience may be sorely tried during this time. However, it has been our experience that clients who are forewarned have a much higher tolerance level for the slowly turning wheels of justice.

9. Doctor/ Treatment
       It will help your case to tell us and your doctors about any injury or medical problems before or after your accident. Good cases can be lost by the injured person's concealing or forgetting an earlier or later injury or medical problem. Insurance companies keep a record of any and all claims against any insurance company. The insurance company is sure to find out if you have ever made a previous claim.
       Tell your doctors all of your complaints. The doctor's records can only be as complete as what you have given. Keep track of all prescriptions and medicines taken accompanied by the bills. Also save all bottles or containers of medicine.
       
10. Bills 
       Retain all bills, which relate to your damages, including medical expenses, hospital expenses, drugs and medicines, therapy, appliances, and anything needed to assist you in your recovery. If possible, pay these bills by check or money order, so that a complete record may be kept. If this is not possible, be certain to obtain a complete receipt with the bill heading on it, to indicate where the receipt came from and the party issuing it.
   
11. Evidence
       Be certain to keep anything that comes into your possession which might be used as evidence in your case, such as shoes, clothing, glasses, photographs, defective machinery, defective parts, foreign substances which may have been a factor in your accident, etc. Be sure to let the office know that you have these items in your possession.
   
12. Photographs 
       Take photographs of all motor vehicles, accident site, etc., that may be connected directly or indirectly with your accident. Again, be sure to let the office know that you have such photographs.

13. Keep your attorney advised 
       Keep this office advised at all times with respect to changes in address, important changes in medical treatment, termination of treatment, termination of employment, resumption of employment, or any other unusual change in your life.
   
14. Lost wages 
       Keep a complete record of all lost wages. Obtain a statement from your company outlining the time you have lost, the rate of salary you are paid, the hours you work per week, your average weekly salary, and any losses suffered as a result of this accident. Where possible, also obtain other types of evidence such as ledger sheets, copies of time cards, canceled checks, check stubs, vouchers, pay slips, etc.
   
15. New information 
       In the event that any new information concerning the evidence in this case comes to your attention, report this to the Attorney immediately. This is particularly true in the case of witnesses who have heretofore been unavailable.

16. Do not discuss the case
       The insurance company may telephone you and record the conversation or send an adjuster (investigator) who may carry a concealed tape recorder. You should not discuss your case with anyone.

       Obviously, we cannot stress too strongly that you  DO NOT discuss this matter with anyone but your attorney or immediate, trusted family. You should sign no documents without the consent of this office. Remember that at all times you may be photographed and investigated by the opposition. If you follow the simple precautions, which we have set out in your checklist, we feel that we will be able to obtain a fair and appropriate amount for your injuries. If you get any letters from anyone in connection with your case, mail or fax them to your attorney immediately.

17. Questioning 
       If any person approaches you with respect to this accident without your attorney's permission, make complete notes regarding the incident. These notes should include the name and address of the party, a description of the person, and a narrative description of what was said or done. Under no circumstances should you answer any question(s). All questions should be referred to your attorney's office.

18. Investigation by Defendant Insurance Company
       Permit us to reiterate at this time that the opposition's insurance company will in all probability have a team of lawyers and investigators working diligently to counter your claim. During the course of their investigation, it is quite possible that they may attempt to contact you through various (and sometimes, devious) methods. Please do not make their jobs any easier for them by answering their questions.

       We cannot emphasize too strongly that you should refrain at all times from discussing this matter with anyone--and that includes your employer, your relatives, your neighbors, and even your friends. Of course, there are exceptions to this rule.

       If there are friends or neighbors or relatives who know all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the accident and can be of assistance to you, then they should be referred to this office so that their natural sympathy can be channeled into an effective asset for you.

       Insurance companies pay money to claimants when they are satisfied there are both liability and damages that support a recovery. They can be expected to thoroughly investigate the facts of the accident and any past injuries or claims. The insurance company will obtain copies of all of the claimant's past medical records.


 19. Surveillance by Insurance Companies
       Remember at all times that you may be under surveillance and, therefore, subject to being photographed or filmed by the adverse party.  Be advised that there are cases where photographs and films have been introduced in court showing claimants who were allegedly in serious condition participating in activities which they alleged they were unable to do. You do not have to live in fear of being  photographed, of course, if your cause is a just one.

       However, when carrying on your usual activities, keep in mind at all times that you are subject to investigation. If you have been seriously injured, do not do anything that will jeopardize your case during the course of your daily life. You should always follow your doctor's advice. If you have to do things, which cause you, pain, this can usually be explained to the full satisfaction of any court or jury.

       There are cases where the insurance agent has attempted to discredit a personal injury plaintiff by taking movies of the claimant engaged in various physical activities. In one case, large rocks weighing over one hundred pounds were placed at the door of the garage during the night so that claimant would have to be forced to remove the rocks in order to drive to work. This, of course, was filmed and used to discredit the plaintiff's claim in court.
       
20. The value of a case depends on the Permanent Injury, medical treatment and doctor's reports
       Undoubtedly, you have questions as to how much your case is worth.  We are going to be frank:  The fact of the matter is there can be no answer to this question until we have completed the investigation in your case.  Once we complete our investigation, of course, we can make a determination as to the amount of the defendant's liability, if any, and even at that we will only be at a starting point.  After that, we must obtain all necessary information concerning your lost wages, your disability, your partial disability, your life changes, and your prognosis.  You may rest assured of one thing, however, and that is the fact that your case will not be settled below its true value, that is the fair compensation for the injuries you have received.  You may also rest assured that no settlement agreement will be entered into without your consent.

Conclusion
       We appreciate that this is a great deal of information to absorb.  We also appreciate that our requests for client's assistance have been numerous. However, we are certain that our clients appreciate having this information from the outset.  Each request and bit of information given here represents an important part in recovering full value for your injury. Therefore, we respectfully request your full cooperation. If you have questions or concerns regarding these instructions, we encourage you to feel free to contact the office at any time.  

 CALL KENNETH A. VERCAMMEN, ESQ. 732-572-0500 for an appointment

About Kenneth Vercammen:

       Kenneth Vercammen is a Litigation Attorney in Edison, NJ, approximately 17 miles north of Princeton. He often lectures for the New Jersey State Bar Association on personal injury, criminal / municipal court law and drunk driving.   He has published 125 articles in national and New Jersey publications on municipal court and litigation topics. He has served as a Special Acting Prosecutor in seven different cities and towns in New Jersey and also successfully defended hundreds of individuals facing Municipal Court and Criminal Court charges. 
              
       In his private practice, he has devoted a substantial portion of his professional time to the preparation and trial of litigated matters.  He has appeared in Courts throughout New Jersey several times each week on many personal injury matters, Municipal Court trials, matrimonial hearings and contested administrative law hearings.
              
       Since 1985, his primary concentration has been on litigation matters.  Mr. Vercammen gained other legal experiences as the Confidential Law Clerk to the Court of Appeals of Maryland (Supreme Court), with the Delaware County, PA District Attorney Office handling Probable Cause Hearings,  Middlesex County Probation Dept as a Probation Officer, and an Executive Assistant to Scranton District Magistrate, Thomas Hart, in Scranton, PA.


 KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
(Fax)    732-572-0030
website: www.njlaws.com 
More details at http://www.njlaws.com/bike_accidents.html?id=7229

What happens in a Fall down accident case

Liability for fall downs and injury claims

The NJ law imposes upon the owner of commercial or business property the duty to use reasonable care to see to it that the sidewalks abutting the property are reasonably safe for members of the public who are using them. In other words, the law says that the owner of commercial property must exercise reasonable care to see to it that the condition of the abutting sidewalk is reasonably safe and does not subject pedestrians to an unreasonable risk of harm. 
The concept of reasonable care requires the owner of commercial property to take action with regard to conditions within a reasonable period of time after the owner becomes aware of the dangerous condition or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have become aware of it.
Property owners also have an obligation to keep their parking lots clean and safe.
    The Anchor tenant stores often also have duties under a lease and under the law. The snow removal and maintenance companies are also sometimes to blame for negligence & injuries.
         Inside, the commercial business typically is liable for fall downs, not the property owner. For example, if someone slips and falls inside the store, restaurant or hotel, the negligent company is liable. This includes slip and falls on wet floors near the entrance to a store or public business.
What actions must the owner of commercial property take with regard to defects/snow/ice accumulation/dangerous conditions? The action required by the law is action which a reasonably prudent person would take or should have taken in the circumstances present to correct the defect/snow/ice accumulation/ dangerous condition, to repair it/remove it or to take other actions to minimize the danger to pedestrians (for example, to give warning of it) within a reasonable period of time after notice thereof. The test is: did the commercial property owner take the action that a reasonably prudent person who knows or should have known of the condition would have taken in that circumstance? If he/she did, he/she is not negligent. If he/she did not, he/she is negligent.
The NJ Supreme Court held Commercial landowners are responsible for maintaining in reasonably good condition the sidewalks abutting their property and are liable to pedestrians injured as a result of their negligent failure to do so." Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 157 (1981). A commercial landowner may be liable to a pedestrian who is injured due to the condition of the sidewalk, "if, after actual or constructive notice, [the owner] has not acted in a reasonably prudent manner under the circumstances to remove or reduce the hazard." Mirza v. Filmore Corp.92 N.J. 390, 395 (1983). The commercial property owner's duty to maintain the sidewalk includes the obligation to remove snow or ice if the failure to do so would be negligent under the circumstances. Ibid.


At The Accident Scene -
1. Stop . . . do not leave the scene of the accident
IF YOU FALL DOWN and are injured
AT THE ACCIDENT SCENE
1.    Stop . . . do not leave the scene of the accident. CALL THE AMBULANCE, tell them where the accident occurred and (ask for medical help as needed).
2.   The injured person must prove it what was the negligence.What caused you to fall? Was there garbage or debris on the floor? Was there water on the floor? Did a store have a display where someone could easily trip on it? Did the store let too many people in to shop at once for a special event?

3.    You or friend immediately take cell phone photos of the injury location. Use a cell phone to take photos of the scene and negligent condition. Do this asap before clean up.
4. Notify the property manager or owner, if possible. Insist they observe where you fell. For example, if you fall on an icy sidewalk at the store/ business, notify the manager. Report
5  Get names and addresses of all witnesses- Witnesses will be a tremendous help to you in any subsequent court action if there is any question of liability involved. Get the names and addresses of as many witnesses as possible. If they refuse to identify themselves, jot down any details or the license plate numbers of their automobiles. Do not discuss the accident with the witnesses. Do not give the witnesses' names to anyone but the police, your attorney or your insurance company.
6. While waiting for ambulance, write down or record on your cell phone- Accident Information Date __ Time __ Location __ Weather __  Anything else important
  Summary of accident 
 . Diagram of accident location
7. Again, Call an ambulance or seek medical treatment. If you have any reason to suspect you were injured in the accident, go to a hospital immediately or see a physician promptly. You'll want it on record that you sought treatment right away, not in a week or so. 
8. Write down name of Ambulance crew, Police Officers, Department and Badge Number, , etc. that appeared.
9. Do not assign or accept blame for the accident. - The scene of the accident is not the place to determine fault. Discuss the accident only with the ambulance and medical personnel, your attorney and with representatives of your insurance company. Give the store your name and address. - Be cooperative with the police.
10.Not only is medical attention critical for your safety, but it’s also the first step in building your case. When you’re hurt in a slip and fall, the first thing that you need to do is document your injuries. Visiting a doctor immediately after your slip and fall is the most important thing you can do to create an expert record of your injuries.
Seeking medical attention quickly after a slip and fall also proves the timing of your injuries. It’s common for the insurance companies to try to dismiss your injuries, saying that you must have gotten them on another occasion. Going to the doctor right away prevents the other side from having any chance to say that you got your injuries in another way.
Also, the full extent of your injuries may not be immediately apparent to you after a slip and fall. If you have head trauma, you may not be aware of it. There are a variety of injuries that might be hidden to you in the aftermath of a fall. A medical expert knows what to look for. They can make sure that you’ve identified all of your injuries. Not only is a full accounting of your injuries critical for your recovery, but it’s also essential to build a complete case for a fair recovery.

11. Call a personal injury attorney immediately, not a real estate attorney.Call: Kenneth A. Vercammen, Attorney At Law (732) 572-0500
When you need help the most, we will be ready to help you.
12. Never give a signed statement to the claims adjuster representing the other driver's insurance company. The same goes for a phone recording. They may be used against you in court. These insurance people are sometimes slippery. They call you and be pleasant, then ask “ How are you”. Most persons just say “good” or “ok”. Then the recording is used against them at trial where insurance company states they were good after their accident in 2020.

Call Kenneth A. Vercammen- Trial Attorney   
KENNETH VERCAMMEN & ASSOCIATES, PC
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2053 Woodbridge Ave.
Edison, NJ 08817
(Phone) 732-572-0500
      When you need help the most, we will be ready to help you. 
12. Never give a signed statement to the claims adjuster representing the property owner's insurance company. The same goes for a phone recording. They may be used against you in court to deny your claim. Speak with your personal injury attorney first.

   After you have meet with your attorney
IF YOU HAVE BEEN INJURED BY SLIPPING ON SNOW OR ICE or other fall down negligence
     It is important that you --
1. DO NOT discuss your case with anyone except your doctors and attorney. 
2. DO NOT make any statements or give out any information.
3. DO NOT sign any statements, reports, forms or papers of any kind without approval of your attorney

4. You may have insurance coverages such as Blue Cross, Blue Shield or Major Medical, which require prompt attention. However, be sure to have your treatment providers send bills immediately to all of your insurance companies.
5. Refer to your attorney anyone who asks you to sign anything or to make any statement or report or who seeks information concerning your case.
6. Direct your doctor and other treatment providers not to furnish or disclose any information concerning your case to any entity other than your insurance company without YOU AND YOUR ATTORNEY'S WRITTEN PERMISSION.
7. 
DO NOT appear at other hearings without first consulting with your attorney. INFORM YOUR ATTORNEY PROMPTLY of any notice, request to appear at any hearings.

8. Notify your attorney promptly of any new developments. Small things may be important. Keep your attorney informed.
9. Maintain accurate records of all information and data pertaining to your case.
10. If you or any witnesses should move, be sure to notify your attorney of the new address.
Call Kenneth Vercammen Esq. 732-572-0500

     The following is the portion of the NJ Model Jury charge 5.20 which we used once in a successful case. The Judge read this law to the jury:
  
        The owner of commercial or business property is chargeable with a duty of making reasonable observations of his/her property, including the abutting sidewalk, in order to discover any dangerous condition that might develop or occur. The owner must make observations of his/her property, including the sidewalk, with the  frequency that a reasonably prudent commercial property owner would in the circumstances. If you find that such a reasonable observation would have revealed the dangerous condition alleged in this case, then the property owner is chargeable with notice of the condition although he/she did not actually know about it; that is, he/she is as much responsible for the condition as if he/she had actual knowledge of its existence.
If the unsafe condition is alleged to be snow and ice, N.J.S.A. 40:64-12 and any ordinance adopted by the municipality might be charged as a factor, the jury should consider the reasonableness of the time the defendant(s) has (have) waited to remove or reduce a snow or ice condition from the sidewalk.
If, therefore, you find that there was a condition of this sidewalk that was dangerous in that it created an unreasonable risk of harm for pedestrians, and if you find that the owner knew of that condition or should have known of it but failed to take such reasonable action to correct or remedy the situation within a reasonable period of time thereafter as a reasonably prudent commercial or business owner would have done under the circumstances, then the owner is negligent.
Where there is both a commercial and residential use of the property, the predominant use will determine the status of the property. Avalone v. Mortimer, 252 N.J. Super. 434 (App. Div. 1991), Wasserman v. W. R. Grace Co., 281 N.J. Super. 34 (App. Div. 1995). Hambright v. Yglesias, 200 N.J. Super. 392, 395 (App. Div. 1985), (two-family home utilized as apartment building in commercial property so as to impose duty upon owner to remove the ice from abutting sidewalk). Borges v. Hamad, 247N.J. Super 353 (Law Div. 1990); aff’d, 247 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div. 1990) (owner-occupied three-family house in a residential zone, with two rental units occupied solely by family members, is residential property). There is no affirmative duty on a charitable or religious institution to maintain public sidewalks abutting their properties. Lombardi v. First United Methodist Church, 200 N.J. Super. 646 (App. Div. 1985). But see Brown v. St. Venatius School, 111 N.J. 325 (1998) (school deemed commercial); Restivo v. Church of St. Joseph, 306 N.J. Super. 456 (App. Div. 1997) (leasing apartments even at below fair market value deemed commercial); Gilhooly v. Zeta Psi Fraternity, 243 N.J. Super. 201 (Law Div. 1990) (fraternity deemed commercial property owner).
The Owner of a vacant lot is not a commercial landowner for purposes of imposing sidewalk liability irrespective of the commercial status of the owner or the zoning. Briglia v. Mondrian Mortgage Corporation, 304 N.J. Super. 77 (App. Div. 1997); Abraham v. City of Perth Amboy, 281 N.J. Super. 81 (App. Div. 1995). 
The commercial property owner's responsibility to maintain the abutting sidewalk extends to commercial tenants in exclusive possession of the property.Antenucci v. Mr. Nick's Mens Sportswear, 212 N.J. Super.124, 128-29 (App. Div. 1986). The liability of a commercial tenant for failure to maintain a sidewalk "is concurrent with that of the property owner." Jackson v. K-Mart Corp., 182 N.J. Super.645, 651 (Law Div. 1981)..
See Christmas v. City of Newark, 216 N.J. Super. 393, 400 (App. Div. 1987) holding that Stewart, supra, establishes an absolute municipal immunity for deteriorated sidewalks; but, cf. Levin v. DeVoe, 221 N.J. Super. 61, at 64 n.1 (App. Div. 1987) disagreeing with the holding in Christmas. Shade Tree Commissions created by municipalities are granted absolute immunity pursuant to statute. 

Sunday, March 29, 2020

5.40C FAILURE TO WARN/INSTRUCT Products liability

(Approved 3/00; Revised 10/01)
 In a Civil Jury Trial, the Judge will give an outline of the law and how to determine the facts. These are called Jury charges. We find it is a good idea to provide clients with an outline of the law prior to a trial.
Let me now discuss the law governing the plaintiff’s claim of failure to warn.
If a product fails to contain an adequate warning or instructions, it is defective.  [Plaintiff]says the [Product]did not contain an adequate warning or instruction because [insert short factual description of plaintiff’s contention why the warning was inadequate].  [Defendant]says the [Product]did contain an adequate warning or instruction because [insert short factual description].
The[Defendant]as the manufacturer or seller of a product had a duty to provide adequate warnings or instructions about the dangers the [Product]may present.  [Defendant]had this duty even if the [Product]were perfectly designed and manufactured.  To decide the plaintiff’s failure to warn claim you must determine what warnings and instructions the defendant provided and whether those warnings and instructions were adequate.
Let’s talk about what a warning or instruction is.  Warnings or instructions may consist of statements that a product should not be used at all under certain circumstances, that it should be used only in a particular way, or that it should be used with particular care.  Warnings or instructions may be in the form of words, symbols or pictures.  They must be in a form which will effectively convey the information essential to make the use of the product reasonably safe.
To be adequate, the warning or instruction must be the kind of warning or instruction which a reasonably prudent manufacturer or seller in the same or similar circumstances would have provided to people intended to use the product.  Adequate information may be required to be given to others in the chain of distribution of the product such as from the manufacturer and the seller to the buyer, or from the manufacturer and the seller directly to the user.[2]  An adequate warning or instruction will communicate sufficient information on the dangers of the product and how to use the product safely.  When deciding whether the information provided is adequate, you should take into account the characteristics of the people reasonably expected to use the product and ordinary common knowledge.[3]
In deciding whether the warning or instruction given in this case was adequate, you must assume the [Name of Defendant Manufacturer/Seller]knew of the dangers of the [Product]at the time [Product]was sold/distributed.  With that assumption you must then decide whether the [Defendant]acted in a reasonable, prudent manner in marketing the [Product]without any warnings/with the particular form of warning that was provided. 
[Charge when applicable:]
In this case [Defendant]contends that [describe danger]was not knowable at the time the [Product]was manufactured/sold. If [Defendant]proves that the danger in question was not knowable by it at the time of manufacture or sale, then it had no duty to warn of the danger and cannot be held liable for failure to do so.[4]In evaluating this defense of [Defendant], you may consider evidence relating to [Defendant’s] knowledge of the danger of the [Product].  A duty to warn arises if [Defendant](the manufacturer/seller) actually knew or should have known of the need to issue a particular warning.  
In determining what [Defendant]should have known, you must understand that the law requires a manufacturer/seller to keep reasonably familiar with and to know reliable information generally available or reasonably obtainable in the industry.  In that regard, [Defendant]is deemed to be an expert in its field.[5]  This information may come from experts and literature in the field.  Moreover, information from other sources such as complaints from users, sellers or distributors of an untoward effect of a product may be sufficient to require an appropriate warning.
[Charge when applicable:]
A manufacturer or seller such as [Defendant]may also have responsibility to warn purchasers and consumers of dangers discovered after the product was sold/distributed.  This duty arises when subsequently obtained knowledge, both actual or constructive, was available either at the time of distribution or in sufficient time before the accident/injury so that an effective and reasonable supplemental warning could have been given.  In this regard it is the defendant who must prove that the information about the danger was not reasonably available or obtainable either at the time of distribution or in sufficient time before the accident/injury.[6]
To establish a claim of failure to warn, [Plaintiff]must prove all of the following elements by a preponderance (greater weight) of the credible evidence:
l.       That the [Product]failed to contain an adequate warning/instruction. 

2.      That the failure to adequately warn/instruct existed before the [Product]left the control of the [Defendant].

3.      [Use only when misuse or intentional alteration is an issue and use only applicable portion.]  That when the accident happened the [Product]was not being misused, or it had not been substantially altered in a way that was not reasonably foreseeable.

[Plaintiff]must prove that at the time of the accident the [Product]was being used properly for its intended purposes or for an intended or reasonably foreseeable purpose.  To prove this, plaintiff must show that the product was not being misused in a way that was neither intended nor was reasonably foreseeable.  In this case, the [Defendant]contends that at the time of the accident the [Product]was being misused.  [Set forth a brief factual description of this dispute.]
[Plaintiff]must also show that when he/she used the [Product], it had not been substantially altered since it left [Defendant’s] control.  A substantial alteration is a change or modification made to the product after it was manufactured or sold which both alters the design or function of the product and has a significant or meaningful effect on the product’s safety when used.[7]  In this case the defendant contends that the [Product]was substantially altered.  [Set forth a brief factual description of this dispute.]  
In considering this issue, you must determine whether there has been a subsequent misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration to the [Product].  If you find that to exist, you must determine whether the misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration was reasonably foreseeable at the time the product left the control of the [Defendant].
Reasonably foreseeable does not mean that the particular misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration was actually foreseen or could have been actually foreseen by [Defendant]at the time the [Product]left his/her control.
This is a test of objective foreseeability. You must consider the general experience within the industry when the [Product]was manufactured, sold or distributed. Then decide whether a reasonably careful manufacturer, seller or distributor could have anticipated the misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration of the [Product].[8]  If the alteration reasonably could have been anticipated, and if the alteration made the product not reasonably safe, the defendant is still responsible.  [Plaintiff]has the burden to show that a typical manufacturer or seller of the product could foresee that the product would be altered or that despite the alteration the original defect was nonetheless a cause of the injury.[9]
4.      That the [Plaintiff]was a direct or reasonably foreseeable user, or a person who might reasonably be expected to come in contact with the [Product].[10]  

5.      That the [Plaintiff]would have followed an adequate warning/instruction if it had been provided.[11]


[When defendant offers noevidenceor insufficientevidenceto rebut the heeding presumption, a directed verdict on this issue should be granted.]

[When defendant offers evidencesufficient to rebut the heeding presumption, charge as follows:][12]

In this case, [plaintiff’s name]claims that the [product’s name]was defective because there was no adequate warning/instruction.  If you find that the [product’s name]was defective because adequate warning/instruction was not given, then you must decide whether the lack of an adequate warning/instruction was a proximate cause of the accident.  
The[defendant’s name]has introduced evidence seeking to show that [plaintiff’s name]would not have read and followed an adequate warning/instruction even if one had been provided by the defendant. 
You have to decide whether plaintiff would have read and heeded a warning/instruction had one been given or that he would not have read and heeded a warning/instruction had one been given.  
Plaintiff has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that he/she would have followed an adequate warning/instruction if it had been provided.  

6.      That the failure to adequately warn/instruct was a proximate cause of the accident/injury.[13]  

Proximate cause means that the failure to warn/instruct was a substantial factor which singly, or in combination with another cause or causes, brought about the accident.  [Plaintiff]need not prove that this accident could have been anticipated so long as it was foreseeable that some harm could result from the failure to warn/instruct.  If an adequate warning/instruction would have reduced the risk of the occurrence of this accident, you may find that its absence was a contributing factor to the happening of this accident.  If, on the other hand, the failure to warn/instruct does not add to the risk of the occurrence of this accident and therefore is not a contributing factor to the happening of the accident, then plaintiff has failed to establish that the failure to warn/instruct was a proximate cause of the accident.
[Instruction on intervening cause, where applicable:]
In this case the [Defendant]contends that [set forth defendant’s contention]was an intervening cause.
An intervening cause is the act of an independent agency which destroys the causal connection between the defect in the product and the accident.  To be an intervening cause the independent act must be the immediate and sole cause of the accident.  In that event, liability will not be established because the failure to warn/instruct is not a proximate cause of the injury.  However, the defendant would not be relieved from liability for its failure to warn/instruct by the intervention of acts of third persons, if those acts were reasonably foreseeable.  Where the intervention of third parties is reasonably foreseeable, then there is a substantial causal connection between the product defect and the accident.[14]  You must determine whether the [alleged intervening cause]was an intervening cause that destroyed the causal connection between the failure to warn and the accident.  If it did, then the failure to warn/instruct was not a proximate cause of the accident.
If[Plaintiff]has proven each element by a preponderance of the credible evidence, then you must find for [Plaintiff].
If, on the other hand, [Plaintiff]has failed to prove any of the elements, then you must find for the defendant.

[When there is a jury question dealing with defendant’s affirmative defense or contributory/comparative negligence, the next three questions are applicable.]

7.            Was the plaintiff negligent?[15]

[Defendant]contends that [Plaintiff]was at fault for the happening of the accident.  [Briefly describe contention.]
To win on this defense, [Defendant]must prove that [Plaintiff]voluntarily and reasonably proceeded to encounter a known danger and that [Plaintiff’s]action was a proximate cause of the accident. The failure of [Plaintiff]to discover inadequate warnings or instructions or to guard against the possibility of inadequate warnings or instructions is not a defense.  Rather, to win on this defense, [Defendant]must prove that [Plaintiff]had actual knowledge of the particular danger presented by the [Product]and that [Plaintiff]knowingly and voluntarily encountered the risk.

8.      Was plaintiff’s negligence a proximate cause of the injury?  

[See Chapter 6 which deals with Proximate Cause.]

9.      Comparative Fault; Apportionment of Fault; Ultimate Outcome.

If plaintiff and defendant both are found to be at fault which is a proximate cause of the accident/injury, the jury must compare their fault in terms of percentages. [See Model Civil Charge 7.31.]
More information on Personal Injury cases at http://www.njlaws.com

[1]  See N.J.S.A.2A:58C-4.  
[2]  For the extent of this duty, seeMichalko v. Cooke Color and Chemical Corp., 89l N.J.386 (l982).
[3]  If the product is a prescription drug, insert the following:  
In the case of a prescription drug, the warning must be one that a reasonably prudent manufacturer would have provided to adequately communicate information on the dangers and safe use of the product to physicians, taking into account the characteristics of, and the ordinary knowledge common to, such prescribing physicians.  
SeeN.J.S.A.2A:58C-4 regarding the effect of FDA approval upon a warning or instruction given for a prescription drug.  See also Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 125 N.J.117 (l991).  
[4]  See Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J.429 (l984).  
[5]  SeeFeldman,supra, footnote 10. 
[6]  There is a post-sale duty to warn.  See Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 97 N.J.429 (l984); Dixon v. Jacobsen Manufacturing Co., 270 N.J.Super.569 (App. Div. l994); Seeley v. Cincinnati Shaper Co., Ltd., 256 N.J.Super.l (l992); and New Jersey Product Liability Act, N.J.S.A. 58-l et seq., section four.  
[7]  See Soler v. Casemaster,Div. of the H.P.M. Corp., 98 N.J.137 (l984); Brown v. United States Stove Co., 98 N.J.155 (l984). Note that an issue of alteration arises only if the particular facts indicate a substantial change relating to the safety of the product.  Soler, 98 N.J.at 148.  Note further that the issue of misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration, if present in a case, presents considerations bearing upon proximate cause. Id.at 149; Brown, supra, 98 N.J. at 171-174.  See also Fabian v. Minster Mach. Co., Inc., 258 N.J. Super. 261 at 277 footnote 5. 
[8]  Where there is an issue of misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration, a jury need not consider the presence of a defect unless it resolves the element of foreseeability against the defendant(s).  In such a case, the trial judge might consider altering the charge so that misuse/abnormal use or substantial alteration is charged first. 
[9]  Brown, supra, 98 N.J.at 169.  
[10]  This may be omitted if not in dispute.  
[11]  In Coffman v. Keene Corp., 133 N.J.581 (1993), and Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J.610 (l993), the Supreme Court adopted the heeding presumption which applies to all failure to warn and inadequate warning cases and provides plaintiff with a rebuttable presumption on the issue of proximate cause, i.e., if a warning or instruction had been given, such warning or instruction would have been heeded by plaintiff.  In such cases, the burden of production on the issue of proximate cause shifts to the defendant to come forward with rebuttal evidence sufficient to demonstrate that a warning would have made known to plaintiff the danger of the product and not withstanding the knowledge imparted by the warning, plaintiff would have proceeded voluntarily and unreasonably to subject himself or herself to the dangerous product.
If the defendant fails to meet this burden of production, the trial judge shall direct a verdict in plaintiff’s favor on this issue of proximate cause.  
If the defendant presents rebuttal evidence such that reasonable minds could differ as to whether the warning, if given, would have been heeded by the plaintiff, the defendant has satisfied its burden of production and plaintiff loses the benefit of the presumption. The plaintiff must then carry the burden of proof (persuasion) as to this proximate cause.  Sharpe v. Bestop, Inc., 314 N.J. Super.54 (App. Div. 1998); 157 N.J.545 (1999).  
When the injury is sustained in the work place, the presumption and burden of the defendant is slightly different.  There the presumption contains a second tier. The presumption is not only that the employee would have heeded the warning, but additionally that the employer would have heeded the warning and communicated it to the employees and enabled them to take precautions.  Theer v. Philip Carey Co., 133 N.J.at 622.  The manufacturer/seller may overcome the presumption by proving that the employee or his or her employer would have disregarded an adequate warning. Coffman v. Keene Corp., 133 N.J.at 609.  Further, “the manufacturer must prove that had an adequate warning been provided, the plaintiff-employee with meaningful choice would not have heeded the warning.” Id.  A meaningful choice requires that the plaintiff/employee not be in a position where he/she is forced to work with the product or machine or lose their job.  Idat 604.  See also Facendo v. S.M.S. Concast, 286 N.J. Super.575 (App. Div. 1996); Graves v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc., 267 N.J. Super.445 (App. Div. 1993) (a non workplace case).  
[12]  Caveat:  There are two threshold determinations for admissibility of rebuttal evidence to the heeding presumption [viz., proof of habit that involves a risk similar to that not warned of]: 
(1) With regard to the substantive proofs necessary to rebut the heeding presumption, it is important to distinguish between habit and character evidence when offered by a product manufacturer to overcome the presumption.  Only evidence of a habit related to the specific situationnot a character trait may be offered to rebut the presumption.  In Sharpe v. Bestop, 34 N.J. Super.54 (App. Div. 1998); 158 N.J.545 (1999), the Supreme Court offered the following:
[T]he Advisory Committee [on the Federal Rules] noted in its Comment to Rule 406 [that] habit ‘describes one’s regular response to a repeated specific situation.’ ‘[B]efore a court may admit evidence of habit, the offering party must establish the degree of specificity and frequency of uniform response that ensures more than a mere “tendency” to act in a given manner, but rather, conduct that is “semiautomatic in nature.”’  Simplex, Inc. v. Diversified Energy Systems, Inc., 847 F.2d 1290, 1293 (7th Cir. 1988).
(2) Even after rebuttal evidence of failure to follow warnings in other contexts rises to the level of habit, the trial court must determine whether such evidence “is sufficiently similar in character and quality to establish the likelihood of a similar response” to the risk or hazard in issue.  Sharpe v. Bestop, 158 N.J.at 331-32 (1999).  Thus in Sharpe, the Supreme Court gave the example that they would “notfind that evidence of one’s repeated failure to follow a doctor’s advice to lose weight is sufficiently similar in character and quality to establish the likelihood of a similar response to a safety warning concerning boating waters.”  (emphasis added) (citing Verdun v. State, Through Dep’t of Health and Human Resources, 598 So. 2d 1091, 1095 (La. Ct. App.), writ denied, 604 So.2d 1003 (La. 1992).  Id.at 329.
[13]  Plaintiff is required to prove that the absence of a warning was a proximate cause of his harm. This is known as product-defect causation.  Coffman v. Keene Corp., 133 N.J.58l, 594 (l993).  Further, in some failure to warn cases another kind of causation must normally be proved -- medical causation.  Therefore, proximate cause may require two questions:  
l.  Was the defect (failure to warn) a proximate cause of plaintiff’s exposure to the product? 
2.  Was the exposure to the product a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injury?  
See Graves v. Church Dwight Co., Inc., 267 N.J. Super. 445, 450 (App. Div. l993).  In cases where the plaintiff is dead or otherwise incapable of testifying at trial, see Sharpe v. Bestop, 314 N.J. Super.54 at 83.  
[14]  Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc., 211 N.J. Super.558, 573 (App. Div. l986), and Butler v. PPG Industries, Inc., 201 N.J. Super.558, 564 (App. Div. l985), may be understood as discussions of a burden of production rather than persuasion.  So construed they clearly conform to Brown v. U.S. Stove, 98 N.J.155 (1984), and prior law.  SeeFabian v. Minster Mach. Co., Inc., 258 N.J. Super.261 at 277, footnote 5 and Johansen v. Mikita USA Inc., 128 N.J.86 (l992). 
[15]  This defense is not applicable to workplace injuries where the plaintiff, a worker, has performed a task reasonably assumed to be part of the assigned duties.  Ramos v. Silent Hoist and Crane Co., 256 N.J. Super.467 (App. Div. l992) at 478; Suter, supra, 81 N.J.at 167-168; Tirrell v. Navistar, Int’l., 248 N.J. Super.at 401-402. In other than a workplace setting, in a product liability case, plaintiff’s comparative fault is limited to unreasonably and intentionally proceeding in the face of a known danger. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc., supra, 76 N.J.at l86.