6.12 PROXIMATE
CAUSE — WHERE THERE IS CLAIM THAT CONCURRENT CAUSES OF HARM WERE PRESENT (Approved
5/98)
Note to Judge
This charge
is designed to address the more complex case where a defendant’s (or a party’s)
negligent conduct combines with other causes that lead to the plaintiff’s
injury (or harm). Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J.
at 417; Camp v. Jiffy Lube #114, 309 N.J. Super. at 309. However, the present charge is not intended
to address those causes where there is an issue as to: (1) the foreseeability of the injury or harm;
or (2) an intervening or superseding cause.
The trial judge should employ Model Civil Charge 6.13 for cases where
the foreseeability of the injury or harm is an issue. Depending upon the facts of the case, Model
Civil Charge 6.14 should be used in conjunction with Model Civil Charge 6.12 or
6.13 if there is an issue as to intervening or superseding causes.
To find
proximate cause, you must first find that [name
of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a cause of the
accident/incident/event. If you find
that [name of defendant or other party]
is not a cause of the accident/incident/event, then you must find no proximate
cause.
Second,
you must find that [name of defendant or
other party]’s negligence was a substantial factor that singly, or in
combination with other causes, brought about the accident/incident/event or
injury/loss/harm claimed by [name of
plaintiff]. By substantial, it is
meant that it was not a remote, trivial or inconsequential cause. The mere circumstance that there may also be
another cause of the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm does not mean
that there cannot be a finding of proximate cause. Nor is it necessary for the negligence of [name of defendant or other party] to be
the sole cause of accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm. If you find that [name of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a substantial
factor in bringing about the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm, then
you should find that [name of defendant
or other party]’s negligence was a proximate cause of the
accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.